CodeCargo Manage
CodeCargo watches every repository and workflow, fixes what drifts as pull requests your owners review, and brings you only the decisions that need a person. You choose how much it does on its own.
The first look is read-only: install the GitHub App, see your estate and CodeCargo's plan. Nothing changes until you say so.
Needs you · 2
Done on its own · 43
How things are going
Trusted by teams managing GitHub at scale
How it works
Every repository, workflow, setting, runner and member, checked against your standards all day, not at audit time.
Fixed rules rank the work, bundle low-risk fixes into one pull request per repository, and keep everything inside your autonomy settings.
Changes go out as pull requests to each repository's owners, in waves, inside your change windows, with the undo prepared before anything runs.
After a merge CodeCargo watches the next runs, undoes a change that causes a regression, and learns from what people approve and decline.
What it keeps right
Deprecations, supply-chain incidents, cost drift, copied workflows and repositories nobody owns. CodeCargo works each area on its own schedule, at the level of autonomy you set for it.
Every repository on your building blocks.
Workflows that are hard to attack.
Compromised actions handled in minutes.
Actions spend you can explain.
Fewer red builds blocking merges.
Years of branch slop, cleaned up.
The right people with the right access.
Audits answered from what already happened.
GitHub Advanced Security
Turn on GHAS across a large org and tens of thousands of Dependabot, code scanning and secret scanning alerts land at once. CodeCargo triages every one and turns the backlog into a handful of decisions.
Safe to dismiss
Test code, development-only and archived. One decision.
Close through 300 update pull requests
Grouped Dependabot updates, merged at your autonomy level
Need their owners
Routed to each service’s owning team, with a fix target
Exploitable in production now
Known exploited, runtime, internet-facing. Fix now.
Severity, exploitability from EPSS and CISA’s known-exploited list, runtime or development dependency, repository tier and blast radius.
Fix now, fix in a batch, accept the risk, false positive, or the owner decides, each with its evidence and a confidence.
Dependency updates merged under your autonomy settings, Copilot Autofix or CodeCargo for code scanning, and guided rotation for leaked secrets.
One vulnerability in 212 repositories is one finding and one decision, not 212 alerts.
Each has a reason, an approver and an expiry. CodeCargo writes it back to GitHub and reopens the alert when it expires.
Leaked secrets, push-protection bypasses and exploited criticals in production reach you now. Everything else is in the briefing.
You stay in control
Set how much CodeCargo does on its own for each area and each tier of repository. Risky changes are always capped lower, every level is earned through a track record, and one button pauses everything.
CodeCargo doesn't look at this area.
Who signs off: —
Opens a finding with its impact. No pull request, nothing changes.
Who signs off: —
Prepares the fix as a pull request, with its undo, and holds it in your Inbox until someone approves.
Who signs off: An approver, then the repository owner
Opens the pull request to the repository's code owners, who review and merge it like any other.
Who signs off: The repository owner
Merges the fix once required checks pass, inside change windows, and reverts it if a later run regresses.
Who signs off: Nobody beforehand; it shows in the briefing
Each cell is how far CodeCargo goes on its own for that kind of fix, in that tier of repository. Each level is explained in the list.
| Area | Productioncustomer-facing | Standardmost repositories | Sandboxexperiments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security fixes | Ask first | Owners review | Automatic |
| Dependency updates | Ask first | Owners review | Automatic |
| Alert triage | Ask first | Ask first | Automatic |
| Network egress | Report only | Ask first | Owners review |
| Cost savings | Owners review | Owners review | Automatic |
| Build reliability | Ask first | Owners review | Owners review |
| Branch hygiene | Report only | Ask first | Owners review |
| Access | Ask first | Ask first | Ask first |
| Developer requests | Off | Owners review | Owners review |
Reading a row: a security fix in a production repository waits for an approver; the same fix in a sandbox merges on its own once checks pass.
Always holds, at every level
Held back: 9 fixes wait because Security fixes in Production is Ask first.Open Inbox
Suggestion: 40 dependency updates merged in Standard repositories with none undone. Raise to Automatic?Review
Prevent, then repair
Every pull request that touches a workflow gets a CodeCargo standards check, in plain words, with an Apply fix button. Once a repository has met a standard for 30 days, CodeCargo proposes locking it in with a ruleset, so cleaned-up repositories stay clean.
The work comes to you
Approve a change type across a scope, not pull request by pull request.
Approve from the Inbox, Slack or Teams. Ask @codecargo for what you need.
What changed, what it saved, what was undone and what needs you. Reply to ask a question.
Pin third-party actions
112 repositories · Production · Low risk
Archive 38 stale repositories
Owners told 14 days ago · Medium risk
Turn on secret scanning
Org setting · all repositories · Low risk
When something breaks upstream
When an action you depend on is compromised, CodeCargo finds every workflow that uses it, proposes the whole response at once, and runs it the moment one approver says yes. Every safety rule still applies; only the waiting goes away.
Scoped
9 workflows in 6 repositories use the compromised action
Contained
Action blocked in the org; every use pinned to the last known-good commit
Traced
2 runs contacted the attacker; 4 secrets they could reach, with owners
Closed
Secrets rotated, pins verified, incident report ready for the auditors
Day one
Everything stays at Report only or Ask first until you grant write access, area by area, when you're ready.
Read access is enough to start.
Scores by area, the five things CodeCargo would fix first, avoidable Actions spend and how many branches and pull requests are dead.
Pick a preset and tell CodeCargo which repositories are production.
Slack, Teams or email.
What CodeCargo will do in each area in its first week.
Migrating to GitHub with CodeCargo?
Manage starts on the standards and building blocks you landed with, so nothing drifts after cutover.
Security and change-management teams ask these first. We're happy to go deeper.
Only where you allow it. Every area starts at Report only or Ask first. You raise an area to Owners review or Automatic per repository tier, risky changes are always capped lower, and one button pauses everything.
CodeCargo's GitHub App, so every change is attributed to CodeCargo, not to a person's account. Each one records the area, the standard, the autonomy setting and who approved it.
Every change has its undo prepared before it runs. Changes go out in waves with canaries and stop on the first failure, and after a merge CodeCargo watches the next runs and undoes a change that causes a regression.
Read access to start. Write permissions are granted area by area when you are ready, and until then CodeCargo only reports and prepares fixes for you to approve.
Yes. CodeCargo turns on and triages GitHub Advanced Security: every Dependabot, code scanning and secret scanning alert gets a verdict, one vulnerability across many repositories is one decision, and dismissals are approved exceptions written back to GitHub. It also rolls out CargoWall from audit to enforce through CargoWall's own tools.
No. Low-risk fixes are bundled into one pull request per repository, CodeCargo respects each team’s capacity and change windows, and it learns from what people decline.
No. Manage works on any GitHub Enterprise Cloud estate. Customers who migrate with CodeCargo start on the standards and building blocks they landed with.